Practice and assessment tools
A place for students to do the thing rather than read about it. Record an answer, submit an attempt, work a problem. Built for your subject, not bent out of a generic quiz feature.
Course platforms are built to deliver lessons and take payment. They are not built for the part where a student practises something, gets told how they did, and tries again. That loop is what actually creates results, and it is usually the thing eating your instructors' time. We build the missing tool and put it inside the course you already run.
The common thread is the same: take the work an instructor repeats for every student, and give it to software, so the instructor is free for the part only a person can do.
A place for students to do the thing rather than read about it. Record an answer, submit an attempt, work a problem. Built for your subject, not bent out of a generic quiz feature.
The response a student gets immediately, so they can try again while they still care. This is where instructor hours disappear, and it is the single highest value thing to automate in most education businesses.
What a student has done, how they are trending, and where they are stuck. Useful to the student, and far more useful to you, because it shows exactly where your course loses people.
The tool belongs inside the course, not on a separate site with a second login. We build to sit within the platform you run, so the practice lives next to the lesson it belongs to.
TalkTalk Global is a program run by two speech-language pathologists, helping people speak English more clearly. Their students needed a way to practise reading aloud and find out how they did without waiting for a teacher to listen to every recording.
We built an in-browser practice tool: twenty standard reading passages, recording in the browser with nothing to install, immediate scoring on fluency, accuracy and pronunciation, and progress across passages. It runs inside the client's own course platform, and it is live with real users today. The case study is published with their permission.
One detail worth repeating, because it is the kind of thing that decides whether education software is trustworthy: the program teaches clear pronunciation and does not promise to remove anyone's accent. The tool does not either. Scope boundaries like that belong in the build from day one, not in a disclaimer afterwards.
Every project starts as one of these. Which one fits you is decided in the free written plan, before any money moves.
Replace a straining spreadsheet or shared inbox with one clear tool built for your records, rules and team.
See moreJoin the data, decisions, people and status of one process so nobody is retyping information between systems.
See morePull the useful facts out of documents, check them, and send them where they need to go.
See morePut your pricing rules, exceptions and approvals into one tool that produces the same answer every time.
See moreUsually yes. Most course platforms allow an embedded tool, and the TalkTalk build runs inside the client's platform this way. What each platform permits differs, so we confirm it during the free planning stage and write the answer into the plan before you pay.
Only where it genuinely helps. Some feedback is better handled by clear fixed rules, which are cheaper to run and easier to explain to a student who disagrees with a score. Where AI is the right tool we say so plainly, including what it can and cannot judge reliably.
Access rules and data handling are part of the build rather than an afterthought, and the plan names what is stored, where it lives and who can see it. We will also tell you when a project needs heavier regulatory controls than a short fixed price build can responsibly carry.
Evan Atha reads every request himself, usually the same business day. The written plan is free, and it tells you honestly whether a fixed price build is the right move.